Defining value: whose point of view is it, anyway?

permission marketing on listservs The new, more socially oriented rules of marketing and public relations tell us: don’t just email/blog/tweet at/message people; deliver value to them, and with their permission. Make them feel respected and cared about. Let them know that you can solve their problems. Listen to them in the spaces where they are; don’t expect them to come and listen to you.

It’s the “listening” part that we trip up on the most. To some extent I think that’s natural for humans, perhaps even more profound in a newly social (some would say self-obsessed) scene where everyone has something to say.

In a marketing context, we fail to listen when we become so convinced that our product or service can solve problems, that we start telling our customers all about how. Even in spaces not built for that purpose.

Vendors in investigators’ clothing

In the past few weeks, I’ve noticed on a couple of the investigators’ listservs that marketers are starting to become more vocal. I include myself in that group. I’ve put press releases out to those groups, notifying them that new training (free or fee) was becoming available. I’ve also linked to articles written by clients, as well as my own.

I would never do this if I were not absolutely convinced that the information was valuable to members. But therein lies the rub. If I think I’m providing value, and I am noticed, then the other marketers think they’re missing out. Indeed, a client has taken me to task for mentioning one client but not them.

As I told him, I’m very picky about what I put out to listservs. I don’t want to look like a spammer. But if enough of us put out “valuable” information (or contact members off list)… we will all look like spammers. Worse, the listservs will lose membership. That means investigators not connecting with each other for critically needed resources.

The owner of one listserv is a good friend, and I emailed him to ask his advice. Would he prefer we sent him stuff first, for him to choose to put on his list? Or would he prefer silence? Perhaps the biggest question of all: do vendors belong on the restricted listservs to begin with?

Many LinkedIn groups say no, because they’ve faced these problems before. (The listowner who’s a friend invited me when all I was doing was trade journalism.) Some groups are so sensitive that they’ll go as far as to ban marketing members.

Thing is, groups and listservs like these provide valuable intelligence about what problems our target markets are having, what their needs are. That’s true even if we’re attending training and demo’ing products in the field. Because we can never know what it’s really like to sit behind those desks.

What it means to give value

I’ve blogged before about the need for marketers to be more a part of the community, and a listserv is just a microcosm of the larger investigative community. Sure – it may be set up as a very simple information exchange, where members mainly ask for contacts at ISPs and phone companies. But it’s still a community where the investigators trust one another to give them the information they need – that they actually need – not just what we think they need.

“But how do we get people to come to our webinar?” we cry. “Or subscribe to our blog? Or attend our training?” Short answer: not like we’re trying to get them now.

We should be linking to articles that have nothing to do with our clients and flipping through our own Rolodexes for people who can help them. We should also be asking listmembers for help, not “market research,” but as real investigators who use real processes to work their cases:

How do their systems work? How don’t they work? What do they need? What can we do better – not just better than the competition, but better than ourselves? Again: listening, the kind that encourages listmembers to consider dropping by our site, where all kinds of lovely content awaits them – the kind that not only shows our product’s or service’s value, but shows it to them, because it was born from their living feedback.

Forensics practitioners, how would you prefer we marketers interact with you? Marketers, what can we improve about the way we attract attention?

Image: bareknuckleyellow via Flickr

Making time for content

Over the last few weeks, I've been buried in work. So have my clients. The economy has everyone skittish, because our prospects aren't buying like they did five years ago. Even the fact that ...

Read the full article »

Blogging for the digital forensics business

At Techno Security a few weeks ago, I had the occasion to talk to a couple of marketers with a forensic software firm. We talked about their content plans, and I was impressed enough to ask: if they were tweeting, why ...

Read the full article »

Building on content marketing

On Friday, Digital Forensics Magazine published a blog post of mine: 5 Reasons for Digital Forensic Examiners to use Content Marketing. It was an expansion of a short piece I'd done for their monthly newsletter. It's not just for private companies Weighted toward the private side? OK, yes, it is, in that in my examples ...

Read the full article »

Are you part of the community you serve?

Eric Huber's post about Guidance vs. AccessData touched a nerve (as you'll see from the comments I left there). Over the last 18 months of business-building, I've read many ...

Read the full article »

Using email for marketing

Sharon Nelson's recent blog post caught my eye, because while I read a lot of blogs about digital forensics, and I also read a lot of blogs about marketing, it's rare to find ...

Read the full article »

Reputation management is not about dishonesty

“Reputation management” is a concept that makes sense for organizations trying to maintain their brands. Whether they have a strong online presence or not, companies' and agencies' reputations are made or broken on the actions of ...

Read the full article »

CyberSpeak: The online resume

I was very pleased when Ovie Carroll, co-host of the forensic podcast CyberSpeak, invited me on the show to talk "online resumes" and what they mean to law enforcement and other investigators. Click here to listen to Ovie and me discussing: Why an online ...

Read the full article »

Build the person, build the team

I've been talking with a friend about his professional branding efforts. He described his frustration with his current company, which seemed disorganized and uncertain of where they wanted him to go or what they wanted him to do. He wanted to continue building his brand as ...

Read the full article »

When no one is watching

My patrol officer neighbor has an interesting front license plate on his cruiser. It reads something like, “Reputation is what you do when other people are watching. Character is what you do when no one is watching.” I've heard this before, just never seen it on ...

Read the full article »

free subscription

To get The Outstanding Investigator delivered FREE via email, enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About this blog
"The Outstanding Investigator" is a blog about how to build your professional credentials -- not just to make yourself look good, but also to make your team and/or organization look good. If you're a manager, read this blog to learn about how to mentor truly outstanding professional investigators.
About the author
Christa M. Miller specializes in public relations, writing and editing for the law enforcement and digital forensics communities.How can I help you?
e-mail
christa (at) christammiller dot com Remember to type two m's in that domain name!